Tuesday
second night of split 1st Round:
JM CS TA (JR)
Simon Rosner v Chris Ryder; 2 reviews per player/game Game 1 – no reviews
Game 2 – SR review; decision upheld
- CR review; decision changed In total 2 reviews: 1 upheld, 1 changed. (Reviewed with Simon and no issues)
JM JR CS (JA)
Gregory Gaultier v Olli Tuominen; 2 reviews per player/game Game 1 – GG review, decision changed
GG review; decision upheld
Game 2 – GG review, decision changed
Game 3 – OT review, decision upheld In total 4 reviews, 2 upheld, 2 changed (Reviewed with Gregory and I cannot remember any issues)
CS JA JR (JM)
Nick Matthew v Borja Golan; 2 reviews per player/game Game 1 – all I have is 3 reviews; 2 upheld, 1 changed.
Game 2 – no reviews
Game 3 – NM review, decision changed
BG review, decision changed. (No idea why and later TMO
stated he was distracted) In total 5 reviews, 2 upheld, 3 changed
JA JM JR (CS)
Daryl Selby v Tom Richards; 2 reviews per player/game Game 1 – TR review, decision upheld
TR review, decision upheld
DS review, decision upheld
DS review, decision changed
Game 2 – DS review, decision upheld
Game 3 - DS review, decision upheld
TR review, decision upheld
Game 4 – TR review, decision upheld
TR review, decision upheld
DS review, decision changed In total 10 reviews, 8 upheld, 2 changed
Wednesday Quarter Finals;
JR JM CS (JA)
Peter Barker v Stewart Boswell; 1 review per player/game Game 1 – PB review, decision upheld
Game 2 - SB review, decision upheld
Game 3 – no reviews
Game 4 – PB review, decision upheld
PB review, decision upheld
SB review, decision upheld In total 5 reviews, 5 upheld, 0 changed
JM CS JA (JR)
Joey Barrington v James Willstrop; 1 review per player/game Game 1 – JW review, decision upheld
Game 2 – no reviews
Game 3 – JW review, decision changed
JW review, decision upheld
JB review, decision changed In total 4 reviews, 2 upheld, 2 changed (Reviewed with James next day and he was happy with reviews)
JM JR JA (CS)
Nick Matthew v Daryl Selby; 1 review per player/game Game 1 – no reviews
Game 2 – NM review, decision upheld
NM review, decision changed
Game 3 – NM review, decision changed
NM review, decision upheld
Game 4 – NM review, decision upheld
DS review, decision changed In total 6 reviews. 3 upheld, 3 changed (Reviewed with Nick and 1 decision was agreed to be marginal)
CS JA JR (JM)
Simon Rosner v Gregory Gaultier; 1 review per player/game Game 1 – GG review, decision changed
Game 2 – GG review, decision changed
- SR review, decision upheld
- GG review, decision changed
Game 3 - GG review, decision upheld
- SR review, decision upheld In total 6 reviews, 3 upheld, 3 changed
Thursday Semi Finlals;
CS JM JR (JA)
Peter Barker v James Willstrop; 1 review per player/game Game 1 – PB review, decision upheld
- JW review, decision changed
- JW review, decision changed
- PB review, decision upheld
Game 2 – no reviews
Game 3 – no reviews
Game 4 – PB review, decision changed In total 5 reviews, 2 upheld, 3 changed
JA JM JR (CS)
Nick Matthew v Gregory Gaultier; 1 review per player/game Game 1 – NM review, decision upheld
Game 2 – no reviews. In total 1 review, 1 upheld, 0 changed
Friday Final
CS JM JR (JA)
Nick Matthew v Peter Barker; 1 review per player/game Game 1 – NM review, decision changed
Game 2 – NM review, decision changed
Game 3 – no reviews
Game 4 – no reviews In total 2 decisions, 0 upheld, 2 changed
NOTES:
On the Tuesday (Round 2) two appeals were allowed a game. With a correct
appeal a player retained the right to appeal again i.e. retaining the right
to one or two appeals.
This was changed to the right to make one appeal per game with one
additional appeal if the game reached 10-all from the Wednesday
(quarter-finals.)
It is worth barring this in mind when reviewing the total appeals. Initially
there may have been some over-enthusiastic appealing.
