Reports: |
|
THE FAN'S VIEW |
|
|
|
THE FINAL ... | |
HONG KONG POLL It was an entertaining final to the 2002 Cathay Pacific Hong Kong Open. Spectators were asked to drop their lucky draw tickets into a box marked "Power" or one marked "Nicol" according to their prediction for the eventual winner. I had no strong opinions one way or the other and dropped mine into the Nicol box, expecting most of the audience would be betting on Power (see poll results). The pre-match entertainment consisted of a playful exhibition game between Thierry Lincou (wielding an archaic Dunlop Maxply racket) and local player Dick Lau, followed by a slapstick doubles spectacle involving a local twosome and the pair of Anothony Ricketts and Mark Chaloner. THE MAIN EVENT The amusements drew to an end and the mood turned to one of anticipation as Power and Nicol made their entrance. After a solemn knock up, the match got underway and it looked early on as though we were in for a display of attritional rallying. The players were feeling each other out, striking the ball deep without much of a short game. Power pulled ahead, benefiting from early Nicol errors, taking a point by hitting to perfect length and a couple more by misdirecting his opponent. Nicol tightened his game and won a series of exchanges to even the score at 8-8. At this point, Power requested injury time for treatment of back pain. Some in the crowd expressed disbelief, but to be fair, I did in fact spot Power stretching his back on two occasions before his lead was lost. Play continued after a three-minute pause. Power fought on but appeared to be in continued discomfort and went on to lose the game. POWER'S PROBLEMS BACK Power started the second game opting for a more freestyle tactic of cutting the ball short, mixing things up and moving his opponent around. Nicol was sweating profusely at this point, but wasn't slowing down in the least and uncooperatively returned everything he was given. Power's back continued to bother him and he didn't appear quite in tune for the style of play he was aiming for. Several attempts to put the ball away were mis-hit or struck into the tin (aside - why is there no tin within this "tin?" Balls struck down sound about the same as balls struck up, so that many spectators and even the referee are often not sure which was the case). It was in the second game that Power began quarrelling more with the ungenerous referee and several spectators expressed disapproval by applauding no-let decisions or possible stroke situations that were declared mere lets. Nicol took this game 15-9. POWER AND REFEREE DISAGREE In the third game, Jonathon Power adopted a sort of hybrid between a standard length game and the failed shot-making stratagem of the previous game. It seemed to work, as he now made fewer errors and began moving very fluidly, as though his back troubles were long behind him. The downside of this game was that his proclivity for calling every possible let-entitlement resurfaced - as a result of which, the referee's reading became slightly mis-calibrated and several lets were denied on important exchanges where perhaps they were warranted. It should be said that Power often has valid points in his disputes but his need to overplay any interference causes referees and spectators to view him with undue skepticism (for instance, during a rally where Peter Nicol was caught dead in his swing, the referee offered only a let, saying, "he was trying to clear out of the way." In response Power cried, "it doesn't matter that he was trying to clear OUT of the way, he was still IN the way!!"). In any case, various factors caused this game to go to
14-14 and Power chose "set 1." I suspect that even the Power detractors in
the audience momentary willed the Canadian to pull through, as things were
suddenly quite exciting. He won the point on a daring forehand drop that
apparently was good (I couldn't tell for myself due to a video camera
positioned over that very spot and the aforementioned 'silent tin' problem).
Everyone heaved a sigh as the awful tension was lifted and perhaps the
referee was more relieved than anyone else, as Power had made a big issue
about the soundness of her calls. And we
look forward to your reports next year! |
CathaySquash would like to express its
sincere thanks to Amir for his timely, incisive reports which have helped to
bring a different flavour to the reporting from this event.
We hope everyone has enjoyed the coverage, and see you all next year ...
|
SEMI-FINALS ... | |
NICOL AT A CANTER I don't have very much to add about the semi-final matches. Nicol/Boswell was a short affair - Stewart Boswell looked drained from the previous night's encounter and never was able to mount a very serious challenge. Peter Nicol, seemed to know he was in for an easy time and appeared in good humour as he chatted with Ong Beng Hee in the corner between games (Ong seemed to be in good spirits himself and happily posed for photos with local fans). Boswell is a player who doesn't look like he's enjoying
himself on court but has so far managed to keep the pressure on his
opponents. He didn't have much to offer on this occasion and many in the
audience were looking forward to Power/Palmer as the match wrapped up. |
|
QUARTER-FINALS ... | |
Reporting as a fan, I don't need to take note of the exact
score or circumstances surrounding every noteworthy exchange, which is quite
a relief since the details are a little murky the morning after. Jonathon Power vs. Thierry Lincou This first match, was the least arousing of the night. The opening game was tight, but didn't feature any spectacular exchanges. Lincou looks supremely fit, but his shot-making wasn't inventive enough to place Power in real danger. He mounted a mini-comeback to take the first game to "Set 1," but lost the crucial point on an unlucky "no-let" call. The next two games weren't as competitive. Having read coverage of Power matches for quite some time, I must say that his performances here haven't been quite deserving of his reputation as a wizard-like shot-maker. There are occasional flashes of brilliance, but his rallies have been mostly conventional and he seems more interested in fishing for strokes than with putting the ball away. He acknowledges that he's been off his usual game in today's South China Morning Post, blaming improved fitness so perhaps things will be different in his semi-final encounter with Palmer (and there I was, thinking I would improve my fitness) . Peter Nicol vs. Lee Beachill It took a while to become involved in this match. Nicol and Beachill showed up sporting identical Beckhamesque haircuts and donning awfully similar all-black outfits. To make matters worse they share certain facial features and have similar playing styles. It was like watching two clones battle it out. I pity anyone who had to watch on webcam (ok, so Beachill is slightly taller and Nicol has the more pinkish hue and does that grimacing thing when he strikes the ball) (and he's left-handed, Ed). Nicol won in straight games, but every one of them was tightly contested. I'm gradually warming up to Nicol's style. I love his backhand crosscourt and he's simply relentless on every point. Never gripes and doesn't ask for lets unless absolutely necessary. Stewart Boswell vs. Ong Beng Hee A real heartbreaker, and easily the best match of the tournament. I was really rooting for O.B.H. to have a breakthrough at this Open and most of the crowd was clearly behind him as well. What's not to like? His strokes have a unique aesthetic, he's polite and a consummate sportsman (albeit a little more assertive this year) and he seems always to be doing something interesting and different with the ball. In the first two games, he dictated play like a master tactician. Keeping the ball tight down the backhand wall, regulating Boswell's momentum with daring touch shots and slice-like volleys midway through rapid exchanges (and ultimately finding an awful lot of nicks). The score was always close but Ong Beng Hee was in control and Boswell was visibly frustrated. Then in the third, he appeared distracted and nonchalant,
tinning the ball and making errors as Boswell persisted with his attacking
game. In the fourth, it may as well have been me playing - he was slow off
the T and came out on the losing end of a string of drop-shot exchanges. |
|
Round TWO ... |
|
I made it to the indoor games hall in time for the
Power/Price match and took a seat facing the front wall. The good thing
about facing the front wall is that you get a better feel for the pace of
the rallies and a few more vicarious thrills sitting up close than you would
with the more objective view up in the prime seats. You also catch the
occasional sheepish grin when a player knows he's received a lucky call. Power/Price opened with a hotly contested first game, Power as usual expressing amazement at any decision that wasn't a stroke in his favour. Most of the audience seemed amused and even appreciative of the entertainment value in Power's antics. You sense that it's largely playacting but there's a contingent of indignant spectators, aching for some sort of comeuppance to occur. Anyhow, Paul Price soon chimed in with objections of his own, complaining that Power was pushing off him and chatting during play. The ref concurred and asked Power to refrain from further touching. Power went on to win the game by a point. In the second, Power was in fine form and maintained a comfortable lead throughout. The quibbling over contact continued. The ref issued further cautions and an aggravated Power cried out that he was merely maneuvering around his opponent. Price's temper flared -- he punched the wall after one rally and threw a much harder blow on a later occasion. Late in the third, Power pulled off a beautiful fake that delighted the audience. After losing a point at 12-something, Price hurled his racket at the backhand corner and was penalised a conduct point. The match ended without further incident (Power kept uncharacteristically quiet on the last two points). The next match was Stewart Boswell against Karim Darwish. Boswell (a seemingly quiet sort) attempted a most unconvincing tantrum when he cast his racket early on to protest an unfavorable call. He's one of those players with what I'd call a stoic playing style, snapping off powerful strokes with subdued body language (downcast eyes and faint shouldery-lateral movement). It's really pleasing to watch and he played the aggressor to win the match. To his credit, Darwish was never demoralized and played with sustained resolve, pushing the second game to 16-17 and winning the third 15-13. When they returned for game 4, Boswell appeared haggard but managed to surge ahead and take the game 15-5. The last match featured David Palmer against Amr Shabana. Palmer, appeared a bit cocky at last year's Open, but was polite and easygoing throughout last night's affair. Shabana took an early lead and stirred up anticipation of a possible upset, but Palmer inched back into the game and took it 15-13. For the rest of the match, Palmer played effectively to his opponent's backhand. A series of tinned shots, "no-let" calls and a vibration dampener repeatedly popping out of place added to Shabana's problems. He muttered to himself routinely and at one point lamented, "he's too big! I can't see around him!" The highlight of the night came close to the end of the match when Shabana played an exquisitely timed drop-volley off a back wall boast. Palmer recovered it in an astonishingly nimble manner, even as Shabana was making his way to the service box. Shabana shook his head speechlessly when told that he'd lost the point, and the match was over shortly thereafter. I'm certainly looking forward to tonight's matches, especially Ong Beng Hee vs. Boswell and Power vs. Lincou (but the latter is schedule at 5:15 and I'll likely be stuck at work!). |
|
Reports: |